Phoenix retirement planning
CFP® and Enrolled Agent in Phoenix: What the Combination Changes for a Retiree
By Raman Singh, CFP® Since 2016 | EA Since 2026, founder of Singh PWM in Phoenix, Arizona.
No commitment. No sales agenda. 30 minutes.
Section 01
Two credentials, two different grantors
The CFP® (CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™) is granted by the CFP Board, a private standards body. Earning it takes a bachelor's degree, CFP Board registered coursework across planning topics including retirement, tax, insurance and estate, a comprehensive exam, and professional experience. CFP® professionals also agree to the CFP Board's ethics rules, which include a fiduciary duty when providing financial advice.
The Enrolled Agent credential is granted by the Internal Revenue Service. The usual route is the Special Enrollment Examination, a three-part IRS exam. It is a federal credential, so it is not tied to any one state.
Neither body grants the other's credential, and neither exam is a shortcut to the other. That is why holding both takes two separate efforts. Raman Singh's CFP® dates to 2016. The EA dates to 2026, so the EA is the newer of the two and this page does not describe it as a long track record.
Section 03
What the combination changes in practice
The change is not a smarter strategy. It is that the tax return becomes an input to the plan instead of a report on it. When the planner can build a draft of the actual 2026 return, a Roth conversion can be tested against the real bracket, the real Arizona tax at 2.5% (2026) and the real Medicare IRMAA tier before any money moves.
For a retiree, four decisions usually collide on the same return. Roth conversions add ordinary income. Required minimum distributions (RMDs) add more of it later. Medicare IRMAA surcharges are set by modified adjusted gross income, using a two-year lookback, so the 2026 premium schedule reflects 2024 income. And the provisional income thresholds that decide how much Social Security is taxable ($32,000 and $44,000 for married filing jointly, not indexed, 2026) are crossed by the same income. Each one is easy to model alone. The trouble is seeing them together before the year ends.
When the same office prepares the return, the plan also gets checked against what was actually reported: the 1099-R from a conversion, the coding of a qualified charitable distribution, estimated payments made during the year. That feedback loop is the practical benefit. It does not make the numbers come out lower by itself.
Section 04
A CFP® plus a separate CPA or preparer
Many households work with a CFP® professional and a separate CPA or tax preparer, and plenty of those pairs communicate well. The risk is structural rather than personal. The planner usually sees the return only after it is filed. The preparer usually sees one year at a time and may never see the multi-year plan behind a conversion.
Three questions expose the gap. Who owns the tax projection for the current year? Who tells you in September that a conversion would cross an IRMAA line? And who signs the return? In a split arrangement the honest answer is often that nobody owns the projection until the preparer starts the return in the next filing season. In a combined practice, one person owns all three, which also means one person to hold accountable.
A split arrangement can work if both professionals agree in writing on who builds the projection and when it is shared. A combined arrangement can fail if the one person is rushed during filing season. The credential pairing removes one handoff. It does not remove the need to ask how the work is scheduled. The related guide on the CFP® and EA combination covers the coordination points in more depth.
Section 05
What the combination does not mean
An Enrolled Agent is not an attorney, so an EA does not give legal advice or draft estate documents. An EA is not a CPA either. The CPA is a state license with a broader accounting scope, and a CPA who focuses on individual taxes can be excellent. For the full comparison of the three credentials, see the answer page on CFP®, EA and CPA for retirement tax planning.
The combination is also not a guarantee of results. Tax law changes, markets move, and a projection is only as good as its assumptions. Holding two credentials does not prove that any one person is the right fit, and it is not proof of quality on its own. This page also makes no claim about how many professionals hold both credentials. No official count is published, and the page on how rare the combination is explains why.
Section 06
How to verify both credentials
Check each credential with the body that grants it. Do not rely on a website, including this one.
- CFP®: search the CFP Board's verify page at cfp.net for the person's name. It shows whether the certification is active and any public disciplinary history.
- EA: search the IRS Directory of Federal Tax Return Preparers with Credentials and Select Qualifications. The directory can lag by several weeks after a status change and some preparers opt out of being listed, so a missing listing is a reason to ask the person, not proof of anything.
- Registration and disclosures: search the firm and the individual on the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site (adviserinfo.sec.gov). It covers registration, Form ADV and disciplinary disclosures. It is not the place to confirm an EA status.
- Dates: ask for the year each credential was earned. For Raman Singh, the CFP® is since 2016 and the EA is since 2026.
Section 07
Questions worth asking any Phoenix firm
Arizona keeps the state side simple. The flat 2.5% (2026) income tax applies, and Social Security benefits are fully exempt from Arizona tax (2026). That means the planning tension for a Phoenix retiree is mostly federal: brackets, IRMAA and Social Security taxation, with Arizona as a smaller, predictable layer.
Whatever credentials a firm holds, these questions apply. Will you project my return before a conversion, and share the projection in writing? Who prepares and signs the return? How do you charge, and does the fee change with the size of the account? What happens if the IRS sends a notice? How do I verify your credentials myself? A direct answer to each is more informative than any designation.
Example case
Same Roth conversion, decided two ways
This is an illustrative household, not a client. The numbers are a hypothetical built to show sequencing, using 2026 federal figures. They are not a projection for any real person and not tax advice.
- Married filing jointly, both age 67 in 2026, Phoenix residents, neither has started Social Security.
- Baseline 2026 income: $60,000 pension, $30,000 interest and ordinary dividends, $20,000 IRA withdrawals, for $110,000 of income before any conversion.
- 2026 standard deduction for married filing jointly of $32,200 plus $1,650 each for age 65 or older, plus the 2026 senior deduction of $6,000 each, with each spouse's amount reduced by 6% of income over $150,000 (fully phased out at $250,000).
- Federal tax uses the 2026 ordinary brackets for married filing jointly. No capital gains, credits or itemized deductions.
- Arizona tax is 2.5% (2026) of income less $32,200. This assumes Arizona's 2026 standard deduction matches the federal $32,200 for married filing jointly; confirm in the 2026 Form 140 instructions. No other Arizona adjustments, such as the age 65 exemption, are modeled.
- IRMAA surcharge uses the 2026 married filing jointly tiers for two people. Real Medicare premiums are based on income two years earlier, so a 2026 conversion affects 2028 premiums. The 2028 tiers are not published, so the 2026 tiers stand in.
- Row 2: a $200,000 conversion is decided in the fall without a return projection. Row 3: the same office projects the return first and sizes the conversion to stay under the first IRMAA line, with a margin.
| Scenario (2026) | Converted | Income after conversion | Federal tax | Arizona tax at 2.5% | IRMAA surcharge (2026 tiers, both spouses) | Total tax and surcharge | Added cost per $1 converted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No conversion (reference) | $0 | $110,000 | $7,004 | $1,945 | $0 | $8,949 | Not applicable |
| Planner and preparer work separately | $200,000 | $310,000 | $51,076 | $6,945 | $5,770 (tier 2) | $63,791 | 27.4 cents |
| Same office projects the return first | $100,000 | $210,000 | $26,758 | $4,445 | $0 (standard, no surcharge) | $31,203 | 22.3 cents |
Takeaway: In row 2 the conversion lands at $310,000 of income, which is $36,000 over the 2026 tier 1 ceiling of $274,000 and puts both spouses in tier 2. The senior deduction is fully phased out. In row 3 the income stays $8,000 under the 2026 standard IRMAA ceiling of $218,000, so there is no surcharge. Row 3 converts less this year, and the other $100,000 is not tax-free. It is deferred and would face its own bracket and IRMAA test in a later year, so compare the cost per dollar converted, not the totals. The difference comes from doing the projection before the conversion, not from either credential. A competent separate planner and preparer who share the numbers in September can reach the same result. The credential pairing only makes that sharing the default. Real results depend on income, accounts, other taxes and law changes.
Illustrative only. Not a client and not a projection of your results. Real outcomes depend on your full tax return, account mix and the law in force at the time.
Pricing
What working with Singh PWM costs
Tax-aware planning with return preparation under one roof fits the Personalized CFO engagement at $12,000 per year, a flat fee that does not change with portfolio size. A 1% AUM fee on a $2,000,000 portfolio would be $20,000 per year, a difference of $8,000.
One-Time Plan
$6,000
flat, for the whole engagement
A written retirement, tax and Social Security strategy delivered over roughly 2 to 3 months, with no ongoing commitment.
Personalized CFO Planning
$8,000
per year, billed quarterly ($2,000)
Ongoing tax and conversion planning, annual income analysis and reviews. You keep your own investment accounts.
Usual fit for this topic
Your Personalized CFO
$12,000
per year, billed quarterly ($3,000)
Everything in planning, plus investment management and in-house preparation of your tax return.
Ongoing Retainer
27 of 60
Household spots filled · onboarding ~3/quarter
Singh PWM caps the practice by design, so every household gets direct access to Raman Singh, not a team. 2 retainer spots open now, direct to the flat fee, no wait.
One-Time Planning Engagement
Waitlist
Open for the next cohort · 6 to 7 engagements per quarter
One-Time Plans reopen in January 2027. Join the waitlist.
Strategic Fit Interview
30 Minutes
Book anytime, no waitlist
The Strategic Fit Interview is a two-way conversation, not a sales call, and runs independent of the queue above. Most households have a follow-up Strategic Fit Interview II afterward, before any engagement begins.
Flat fees, never a percentage of assets, no commissions. Business-return tax preparation carries a surcharge, and retainer availability is capped. See the full pricing page for current availability.
FAQs
Common questions
Keep reading
- The CFP® and EA combination for retirement
The longer guide to coordination points between planning and tax preparation.
- CFP® vs. EA vs. CPA for retirement tax planning
A side-by-side look at what each credential covers and where the gaps are.
- What is an Enrolled Agent?
How the EA credential works and how it differs from a CPA.
- How rare is a CFP® who is also an EA?
Why no official count of dual holders exists and what can be said honestly.
- IRMAA bracket matrix
The Medicare income tiers behind the surcharge in the example above.
- About Raman Singh and Singh PWM
Background, credentials and how Singh PWM works.
- Singh PWM pricing
Flat-fee engagements, published and not based on assets.
Sources
- Verify a CFP® professional (CFP Board)
- Enrolled agents (Internal Revenue Service)
- Become an enrolled agent (Internal Revenue Service)
- Circular 230 for tax professionals (Internal Revenue Service)
- Directory of Federal Tax Return Preparers with Credentials (Internal Revenue Service)
- Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission)