Retirement Planning for $2M+ Clients — This Is Not a Generic Plan
If you've accumulated $2 million or more heading into retirement, your biggest risk is no longer running out of money. It's making irreversible decisions without a coordinated strategy — overpaying taxes for decades, triggering Medicare surcharges you didn't see coming, and drawing from the wrong accounts in the wrong order. Retirement planning at this level is a precision problem. It requires a specialist, not a generalist.
The $2M+ Retirement Problem Nobody Talks About
Most financial planning conversations at this asset level default to the same tired script: diversify your portfolio, keep expenses low, and don't panic when markets drop. That advice isn't wrong — it's just incomplete. For households with $2 million or more in investable assets, the real complexity isn't investment selection. It's coordination.
You are likely sitting on a large tax-deferred IRA or 401(k) — which is not just a savings account. It is a future tax liability that compounds silently every year you leave it untouched. At age 73, the IRS will force distributions whether you need the income or not. Those Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) stack on top of Social Security, pension income, and investment returns — potentially pushing you into higher brackets, triggering Medicare surcharges, and compressing your heirs' inheritance timeline.
The window to act is finite. The decisions you make in the five to ten years before and after retirement — Roth conversions, Social Security timing, withdrawal sequencing, asset location — are largely irreversible. Getting them right is not about picking better investments. It is about sequencing every decision with tax consequences and income needs in mind, years before those consequences arrive.
This is what retirement planning looks like at $2 million and above. It is not a single plan document. It is an ongoing coordination strategy built around your specific tax situation, your income needs, your timeline, and the legacy you want to leave.
Coordination vs. Fragmentation
Five decisions. One hub. The difference between fragmented advice and coordinated strategy.
Outcomes
For illustrative purposes only. View disclosures
What Retirement Planning Actually Covers at This Level
Tax Alpha and Bracket Management
For $2M+ households, tax planning is not a once-a-year conversation with your CPA in March. It is a year-round strategy that shapes every financial decision. We model your projected income across a 20 to 30 year retirement horizon — identifying the years where your tax bracket is lowest and using those windows deliberately. That means executing Roth conversions when your income is compressed, harvesting capital gains at favorable rates, and coordinating charitable giving strategies like Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) and Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) to reduce taxable income intentionally.
This is what we call Tax Alpha — the measurable after-tax advantage created by how and when money moves, not by trying to beat the market. For a $2M+ retiree, Tax Alpha is often worth more over a full retirement than investment outperformance ever could be.
Tax Bracket Management — Ages 65–85
Roth conversions early reduce RMDs later — keeping income inside lower brackets.
No Strategy: Without proactive Roth conversions, the full $1.8M IRA grows untouched until age 73. RMDs then stack on top of Social Security and investment income — pushing total income above the 24% bracket threshold and triggering IRMAA surcharges.
Hypothetical illustration. $1.8M IRA, 6% growth, $42K Social Security, MFJ. For educational purposes only. View disclosures
Social Security Timing — A Decision Worth Tens of Thousands
Social Security claiming is one of the most consequential and irreversible decisions you will make in retirement. Claim too early and you lock in a permanently reduced benefit for the rest of your life. Delay strategically and you can increase your lifetime benefit by 24% to 32% or more. For a married couple with two earners, the coordination between both spouses' claiming strategies — including survivor benefit planning — can be worth $100,000 or more in lifetime income.
We model Social Security claiming scenarios within the full context of your tax situation, your other income sources, and your portfolio withdrawal needs. The right answer is never the same for every household. It depends on your health, your other assets, your tax bracket, and how much flexibility you have in the early years of retirement.
Social Security Claiming — Interactive Estimator
Adjust claiming ages to see the impact on lifetime income and survivor benefits.
Monthly benefit: $2,800/mo
Monthly benefit: $1,800/mo
Combined Monthly Income
$4,600
per month, both spouses
Lifetime Gain vs. Claiming at 62
+$242K
to age 90
Survivor Benefit
$2,800
/mo (higher of both benefits)
Planning Insight
Both spouses are claiming at or after Full Retirement Age — this maximizes monthly income and strengthens the survivor benefit. The higher-earning spouse's delayed credit continues to compound, protecting the surviving spouse's income for decades.
Hypothetical illustration. Actual benefits depend on earnings history. For educational purposes only — not personalized advice. Consult SSA.gov for actual benefit estimates. View disclosures
Sequence of Returns Risk — The Risk That Doesn't Show Up in a Brochure
Sequence of returns risk is one of the least discussed and most damaging risks in retirement. It refers to the danger of experiencing significant portfolio losses in the early years of retirement — precisely when you are drawing income from your portfolio. A 30% market decline in year two of retirement does far more damage than the same decline in year fifteen, because early losses reduce the base from which your portfolio needs to recover while withdrawals continue.
We address sequence risk through income bucketing — segmenting your assets into short, medium, and long-term pools so market volatility in your growth assets does not force you to sell at depressed prices to fund living expenses. We pair this with dynamic withdrawal guardrails that give you clear signals about when to adjust spending based on portfolio performance — protecting the portfolio without requiring you to guess.
Consider this example: A couple retires at 65 with $2.2M and immediately experiences a 25% market decline. Without a sequencing strategy, they are forced to liquidate growth assets at the worst possible time to fund withdrawals. With a bucketing approach and guardrails in place, their short-term cash reserves fund the first two to three years of expenses without touching the long-term portfolio — giving markets time to recover before growth assets are touched.
Income Bucketing Strategy — $2M Portfolio
Three buckets. Three time horizons. Market volatility never forces a sale.
Years 1–3
Short-Term Bucket
$300,000
15% of portfolio
• High-quality short bonds
• Money market funds
• CDs
Funds all withdrawals. Never exposed to market risk.
Years 3–10
Medium-Term Bucket
$700,000
35% of portfolio
• Intermediate bonds
• Balanced ETFs
• Dividend stocks
Grows modestly. Replenishes the short bucket as it depletes.
Years 10+
Long-Term Bucket
$1,000,000
50% of portfolio
• Global equity ETFs
• Small cap
• Emerging markets
Maximum growth. Not touched for 10+ years.
When Markets Drop — What Actually Happens
Hypothetical $2M portfolio illustration. Bucket amounts for illustrative purposes only. View disclosures
RMD Planning — Managing Forced Income Before It Manages You
Required Minimum Distributions begin at age 73 and they are not optional. For a $2M IRA growing at a modest rate, your first RMD could easily exceed $80,000 — and that number grows every year as the IRS life expectancy table shrinks. Stack that on top of Social Security and investment income and you may find yourself in a significantly higher bracket than you anticipated — not because you made bad decisions, but because you made no decisions.
The solution is proactive RMD management that starts years before age 73. This means modeling your projected RMD trajectory, identifying how much of your tax-deferred balance can be converted to Roth at favorable rates before distributions become mandatory, and coordinating the timing of other income sources to keep your overall tax exposure manageable. We also model Qualified Charitable Distributions for clients with charitable intent — allowing you to satisfy your RMD while reducing your adjusted gross income dollar for dollar.
Required Minimum Distribution Trajectory — Ages 73–92
Roth conversions now mean dramatically smaller RMDs later.
RMD at Age 73
$117,647
annual distribution
RMD at Age 80
$176,898
annual distribution
RMD at Age 85
$236,729
annual distribution
No Roth Strategy: Starting with a $2M IRA at age 73, RMDs begin at approximately $117,647 and grow every year as the IRS life expectancy divisor shrinks. These distributions are fully taxable, stack on top of Social Security, and can push a married couple into the 24–32% federal bracket — or higher.
Hypothetical. $2M IRA at 65, 6% growth. With-strategy assumes $85K/yr Roth conversions ages 65–72. For illustrative purposes only. View disclosures
IRMAA — The Medicare Surcharge Most Retirees Never See Coming
IRMAA stands for Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount. It is a Medicare surcharge that applies to Part B and Part D premiums based on your income from two years prior. For 2025, a married couple with income above $206,000 pays significantly more for Medicare than someone just below that threshold — and the surcharges escalate in tiers from there.
The problem is that IRMAA is triggered by decisions made two years earlier — a large Roth conversion, a business sale, a portfolio rebalancing event. Without forward-looking planning, a single uncoordinated financial decision can cost a couple $5,000 to $10,000 or more in additional Medicare premiums for an entire year. We monitor IRMAA thresholds as part of every client's annual tax strategy — modeling the impact of major financial decisions two years out before they are made.
IRMAA Surcharge Calculator — 2025 Thresholds (MFJ)
Move the slider to see how income affects Medicare Part B & D premiums.
IRMAA Threshold Map
Standard
$0K–$206K
$185.00/mo
Part B each
$370.00/mo combined
Tier 1
$206K–$258K
$259.00/mo
Part B each
+$13.70/mo Part D
Tier 2
$258K–$322K
$370.00/mo
Part B each
+$35.70/mo Part D
Tier 3
$322K–$386K
$480.90/mo
Part B each
+$57.80/mo Part D
Tier 4
$386K–$750K
$591.90/mo
Part B each
+$80.00/mo Part D
Tier 5
>$750K
$628.90/mo
Part B each
+$90.00/mo Part D
Active Tier
Standard
IRMAA Surcharge
None
Below IRMAA threshold. At this income level, you pay the standard Medicare Part B premium of $185.00/month per person. Proactive planning — including careful Roth conversion sizing and income smoothing — can help keep you below the $206,000 threshold and avoid surcharges entirely.
2025 IRMAA thresholds for married filing jointly. Based on income from 2 years prior. For illustrative purposes only. View disclosures
Withdrawal Sequencing — The Order Matters as Much as the Amount
Most retirees know they need to draw income from their portfolio. Very few know that the order in which they draw from different account types has a dramatic impact on their lifetime tax bill. The conventional wisdom — draw from taxable accounts first, then tax-deferred, then Roth — is a useful starting point but rarely the optimal answer for a $2M+ household.
The right sequencing strategy depends on your current tax bracket, your projected future brackets, your Roth conversion opportunity, your Social Security timing, and your estate planning goals. For some clients, drawing from the IRA early and leaving the taxable account to grow is the smarter move. For others, a blend of all three simultaneously — calibrated to fill specific tax brackets each year — produces the best lifetime outcome. We model this across a full retirement horizon and update it annually as tax laws, income, and circumstances change.
Withdrawal Sequencing Strategy Comparison
The order you draw from accounts has a larger impact than the amount.
Advantages
- ✓Simple and easy to understand
- ✓Defers IRA taxation
- ✓Roth grows tax-free longest
Tradeoffs
- ✗Misses Roth conversion window
- ✗IRA grows — causing larger RMDs later
- ✗IRMAA risk increases over time
Estimated Lifetime Federal Tax
$380,000 – $520,000
Verdict
Often suboptimal for $2M+ households
Hypothetical $2.5M household. Lifetime tax estimates are illustrative ranges only. Actual results depend on tax law, income, and personal circumstances. View disclosures
Questions You Should Be Asking Before You Retire — And If Nobody Has Answered These, You Have a Problem
These are not trick questions. They are the basic planning questions that any competent retirement specialist should be able to answer for your specific situation. If your current advisor cannot answer these — or has never raised them — that is important information.
- What will my Required Minimum Distributions look like at age 73, 78, and 83 — and what tax bracket will they push me into?
- How much of my tax-deferred balance should I convert to Roth before RMDs begin, and at what rate each year?
- At what age should each spouse claim Social Security, and what is the survivor benefit implication of each scenario?
- What is my IRMAA exposure for the next three years based on planned income and conversion activity?
- In what order should I draw from my taxable, pre-tax, and Roth accounts — and does that order change as I age?
- What happens to my portfolio if markets decline 25 to 30% in my first three years of retirement, and what is the plan to fund living expenses without locking in permanent losses?
- What does my estate look like from a tax perspective — and what does my IRA pass to my heirs in after-tax dollars, not gross dollars?
- Am I holding the right assets in the right accounts — is tax-efficient placement of bonds, REITs, and equities coordinated across all my accounts?
- What is my plan if I or my spouse requires long-term care — and how does that scenario affect the portfolio and the surviving spouse's income?
- What is the total cost of my current financial advice — and is the value I am receiving commensurate with what I am paying?
If you have sat down with a financial professional and these questions have never come up, you are not getting retirement planning. You are getting asset management. Those are not the same thing.
How Singh PWM Approaches Retirement Planning
We work with a limited number of clients so that every engagement receives direct, hands-on attention. Retirement planning at Singh PWM is not a one-time plan document delivered and forgotten. It is an ongoing coordination strategy — updated annually and whenever life changes — that integrates your tax situation, your investment portfolio, your income needs, and your estate goals into one coherent plan.
Every client begins with a Strategic Fit Interview — a structured 30-minute conversation to understand your situation and determine whether our process is the right fit. If it is, we define the scope and cost of the engagement before any planning work begins. No surprises. No ambiguity.
Raman Singh, CFP® & EA, works directly with every client. No junior staff. No handoffs. No delegation. If you are approaching retirement with real complexity and real consequences, you deserve a specialist who treats your situation that way.
FAQs
Who is retirement planning at Singh PWM designed for?
How is this different from what my current advisor does?
Do you handle both tax planning and tax preparation?
What does the retirement planning process look like from start to finish?
How do you charge for retirement planning?
Can you work with clients who are already retired, not just pre-retirees?
What if I already have a CPA and an investment advisor — do I still need this?
No commitment. No sales agenda. 30 minutes.
FAQs — City-Specific
How do you build a retirement income plan for Phoenix, AZ clients?
Can you help reduce sequence-of-returns risk if I'm in Phoenix?
Do you advise on RMDs for Phoenix retirees?
Showing FAQs for Phoenix, AZ